It seems obvious that rail travel must be more efficient than air travel right? So why are some airlines able to offer ridiculously cheap headline prices for international travel? Well there are two reasons. One way they fund the flights is by getting obscure airports toe PAY them to deliver visitors, and the other is a loophole in the fuel taxes which allow aviation fuel to go untaxed due to the lack of an international agreement between governments. If you don’t think this is right, then you might like consider further ecological arguments for taking the eurostar train instead of the plane.
Eurostar’s 186 mph high-speed train service has become the number one choice for travellers between London, Ebbsfleet, Ashford, Paris, Brussels, Lille, Calais, Disneyland Resort Paris, Avignon and the French Alps. But that’s not all – don’t forget that Eurostar is also a more environmentally friendly option. Flying between London, Paris and Brussels generates ten times more emissions of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) per traveller than going by Eurostar.
Ten times as much CO2!
Eurostar is also committed to generating even less carbon dioxide emissions per traveller in future years and has pledged to achieve a reduction of 25% per traveller journey by 2012 (compared to 2006).
Taking the train is now the only socially responsible green way to travel where its an alternative to flying.
2 responses so far ↓
1 The Top Travel Content Aggregator in Europe // Jul 13, 2009 at 7:24 am
[...] have signed up, a preliminary look showed up some really interesting posts, like this one from Paris Breaks, which explains why Eurostar’s 186 mph high-speed train service has become the number one choice [...]
2 Paris trains // Sep 5, 2009 at 12:06 am
Ifound out that the actual amounts of carbon are very high on plane “Environment Friendly: 100 times less CO2.”
Leave a Comment